The Federal Maritime Commission for the second time in a month denied Maersk’s request to waive the notice period to implement an emergency fuel surcharge the carrier says it urgently needs to recoup sharply rising bunker costs from the effects of the Iran war. In a letter posted on its website, the maritime regulator explained that Maersk (OTC: AMKBY) again failed to establish “good cause” to circumvent the statutory 30-day notice period from publication of the Emergency Bunker Surcharge to when it goes into effect. The FMC earlier rejected an initial request March 4 by Maersk and other lines to waive the waiting period. Maersk filed a second request March 11. The decision was seen as prudent by some who expressed concern over profiteering during the Iran conflict, particularly by carriers that have recently struggled with weaker rates and falling profits. “There are people in the [shipping] business who made their fortunes during the ‘Tanker War’ between Iraq and Iran in the Eighties,” an executive told FreightWaves. Maersk reported a profit of $2.73 billion in 2025. Maersk in its second filing said that due to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz by Iran that stalled tanker traffic, the price of Very Low Sulfur Fuel Oil (VLSFO) at the world’s 20 busiest ports soared from $509 per metric ton on Feb. 6 to $929 per ton on March 9. “Maersk cannot absorb the full impact of this dramatic increase,” the company wrote. “Moreover, bunker fuel prices are likely to remain…
