Top Takeaways A landmark verdict against Meta and Google highlights an ‘addictive’ design that can harm young users’ mental health. The verdict does not force Meta and Google to change design features. Advocates say California should regulate social media design but protect free speech. From infinite scrolling to AI algorithms, some students and youth advocates say the “addictive” architecture of social media has become more apparent after this week’s landmark verdict against Meta and Google. Elise Choi, a 16-year-old student at Orange County School of the Arts, said the verdict affirmed why she needed to step away from social media. “I can report firsthand that it’s genuinely addictive, and after going through initial withdrawal, I’ve found a lot more clarity, ability to focus, less irritability and restlessness,” said Choi, who is now three months into her social media fast. After nearly 40 hours of deliberation, a federal jury on Wednesday in Los Angeles County found Instagram owner Meta and YouTube owner Google liable for harming the lead 20-year-old plaintiff, known as Kaley, who said the platforms intentionally designed features to addict children, and that worsened her depression and suicidal thoughts. Meta and Google are on the hook for a $3 million penalty before the jury decides on punitive damages. TikTok and Snapchat had settled for an undisclosed amount before the trial. About 73% of teens say they go on YouTube daily, and roughly half of teens say they go on Instagram or Snapchat every day. One third of all teens…
